🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," said the European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to follow this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.